John Rogers MacKenzie v. United States

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

This is the third case in a series having similar facts involving conviction for refusal to answer questions propounded by a Congressional committee. AH involve the question of Fifth Amendment coverage.

The first case was Simpson v. United States, 9 Cir., 241 F.2d 222. The second was Wollam v. United States, 9 Cir., 244 F.2d 212.

To give the setting as the trial court had it, we set forth the record of the examination of MacKenzie which was received in evidence:

“Testimony of John MacKenzie, Accompanied by His Attorney, Irvin Goodman

“Mr. Kunzig. Would you give your full…