Legal Opinion

Sandra (Claretta) Hashagen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1960No. 16917_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by Sandra (Claretta) Hashagen from an order of the district court committing her to the custody of the United States Marshal until she purges herself of contempt of court growing out of her refusal to answer several questions put to her by a grand jury on May 12, 1960. Appellant was subpoenaed to appear as a witness before that body and did so on four occasions: May 2nd, 5th, 9th, and 12th. 1 As a result of her persistent and continuous refusal to answer questions propounded to her, she was taken before the district judge on May 12th by the United…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert NeffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Redfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. In Re Master Key Litigation. States of Illinois, and v. Edward H. McCulloch Witness-Appellee AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Loren C. TroescherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Dean Shendal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API