Legal Opinion

Joanne Shane v. United States of America, Sally Ann Hitson, Shirley Joyce McGowan and Betty Lou Hammett v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1960No. 16759, 16695PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

Shane, Hitson, McGowan and Hammett are recalcitrant witnesses before the grand jury in Sacramento in the Northern Division of the Northern District of California. Interstate transportation of women for commercial purposes-is there under investigation. Apparently the activities of men preying upon women (financially) was the subject of a probe to make a case or cases under the Mann Act, 18‘U.S.C. § 2421. Obviously the four appellants are suspected of being the stock in trade of the men. It is believed they are not short on knowledge. All four have been adjudged guilty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad v. Frozen Food ExpressSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Herbert Simpson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Donald M. Wollam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sandra (Claretta) Hashagen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API