Legal Opinion
Wooten v. Hudson
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 30, 1999No. Civ-98-071-BPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BURRAGE, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Petition and Brief for Certification Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(3) filed by Defendants on October 13, 1998 (Docket Entry # 71) to which a timely response and reply and supplements thereto were filed. Upon review and consideration of these pleadings, this Court renders the ruling reflected herein.
Plaintiffs commenced this action against Defendants on November 5, 1997 in the District Court in and for Okfuskee County, Oklahoma. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Dr. Richard Clay Hudson (“Hudson”) performed non-consensual,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Raymond Lurch v. United States of America, Defendant-Third Party v. The Regents of the University of New Mexico and Ralph Kaplan, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Dean W. Lilly v. Paul R. Fieldstone, M.D., and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Irving L. Norton, A/K/A I. L. Norton, and Dana Norton v. Edmond L. Murphy and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Evelyn Falkowski v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Fgs Constructors, Inc. v. CarlowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Demontiney v. United States ex rel. Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Woodruff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Demontiney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Garcia v. ReedDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2002
- Turner v. SchultzDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.