Legal Opinion

Herb v. Pitcairn

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 30, 1945No. Nos. 24 and 25PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

These cases were heretofore considered and disposition was deferred to enable petitioners to apply for clarification of the grounds upon which the Supreme Court of Illinois intended to rest its judgments. Herb v. Pitcairn, 324 U. S. 117.

That court, responding to petitioners’ request, has made clear that its judgment resulted solely from its interpretation of a federal statute of limitations applicable to actions under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act which provided: “No action shall be maintained under this chapter unless commenced within two years from the day the cause of action…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herb v. PitcairnSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Testa v. KattSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API