Legal Opinion

United States v. David Thomas Schieman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 23, 1990No. 89-1782PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Chief Judge.

A defendant who is convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) and has three previous convictions for a violent felony or serious drug offense or both, committed on occasions different from one another, is subject to the penalty enhancement provisions of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Section 924(e) provides that such a person shall be imprisoned for not less than fifteen years. The *910first issue on appeal is the appropriate standard by which to determine whether the defendant has three previous convictions. The second issue is whether two of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Edwin A. Towne, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. David D. SchoolcraftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. John J. Gillies, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Samuel PettyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Balascsak, Robert J.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas L. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Calvin B. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Benjamin Thomas Tisdale, IIICourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Michael James BradyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Mark A. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API