Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Publishing Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 8, 2008No. SC 17647Published

1Dissent

*689PALMER, J.,

with whom KATZ, J., joins, dissenting. The sole issue raised by this appeal is a straightforward one: whether a new trial is required due to the fact that the trial court improperly failed to instruct the jury on the defense raised by the defendant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company (Hartford), that it suffered material prejudice because the plaintiff, National Publishing Company, Inc. (National), had provided Hartford with late notice of its business interruption claim. A new trial would be necessary only if Hartford could establish on appeal that the outcome of the trial likely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. George v. EricsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Coughlin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Allison v. ManettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. National Publishing Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API