National Publishing Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Dissent
*689PALMER, J.,
with whom KATZ, J., joins, dissenting. The sole issue raised by this appeal is a straightforward one: whether a new trial is required due to the fact that the trial court improperly failed to instruct the jury on the defense raised by the defendant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company (Hartford), that it suffered material prejudice because the plaintiff, National Publishing Company, Inc. (National), had provided Hartford with late notice of its business interruption claim. A new trial would be necessary only if Hartford could establish on appeal that the outcome of the trial likely…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- George v. EricsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Coughlin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Allison v. ManettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- National Publishing Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.