Legal Opinion

Hickman v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1950No. Docket 88, Calendar 44,484PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

On the 8th of June, 1948, and for some time prior thereto, plaintiff was employed by the ■city of Detroit in its department of street railways as an extra coach operator. He worked out of the Highland Park garage terminal located on Second avenue. On the date mentioned he quit work at 12 -.48 a. m. Under the terms of his employment he was required to report to the terminal for a 5:30 a. m. “show up,” for the purpose of being assigned to a run, if available for him.

After checking out of the terminal plaintiff drove his automobile downtown, returning to the terminal shortly after 3 a. m. It is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Spooner v. Detroit Saturday Night Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Brink v. J. W. Wells Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Luteran v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dyer v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. MacK v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Pilgrim v. MenthenMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Ditch v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Weaver v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API