Legal Opinion
United States v. Krilich
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 27, 1996No. 92 C 5354PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HART, District Judge.
Defendants in this case are Robert Krilich and various corporations that he controls. Plaintiff United States alleged that defendants, in violation of the Clean Water Act, filled wetlands at two sites they owned in the Chicago area. Prior to the filing of this case in August 1992, the parties had agreed to a proposed consent decree. Following a comment period and the filing of motions with the court, the proposed consent decree, as modified, (the “Decree”) was entered on October 29, 1992. Now pending is the government’s motion to enforce the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Leovy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Lake River Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Carborundum Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Commissioner of Environmental Protection v. Connecticut Building Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Gary South v. Charles RoweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. AlshabkhounCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Robert R. Krilich, Krilich Companies, Inc., Riverwoods Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Witco Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. JaigobinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- United States v. KrilichDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.