Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Morris Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 7, 2003No. 02-5210PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.'

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd. (“BATCo”), seeks an emergency stay pending expedited appeal of the district court’s discovery orders requiring BATCo to produce an allegedly privileged document. In the alternative, BATCo seeks a writ of mandamus vacating the orders. BATCo contends that this Court has jurisdiction over its appeal under the collateral order doctrine. See Cohen v. Beneficial *615Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. In Re: Gregory LottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Herlancer Ross v. City of Memphis, Walter Crews and Alfred Gray, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. In Re: Gordon R. England, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  5. In re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API