Saunders County v. Metropolitan Utilities District-A
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Irwin, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Saunders County appeals from orders of the Department of Natural Resources (Department) dismissing 18 causes of action. The Department dismissed the 1st cause of action in one order and dismissed the 2d through 18th causes of action in another order; the appeals of each order have been consolidated. On appeal, Saunders County asserts various errors, including the continued involvement of the hearing officer, LeRoy W. Sievers; the denial of subpoenas; and the dismissal of the causes of action. We find no merit to Saunders County’s assertions on appeal, and the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- PONDEROSA RIDGE LLV v. Banner CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Hagelstein v. Swift-Eckrich Division of ConAgraNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Snyder v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Metropolitan Utilities District v. Twin Platte Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- SID No. 67 v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Madson v. TBT Ltd. Liability Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of ForsterNebraska Court of Appeals · 2014