Legal Opinion

Einerson v. Wisconsin Tornado Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

There is no dispute as to the facts. So far as material to the point which is decisive on this appeal, they are as follows: Appellant is a mutual wind-storm insurance company incorporated under ch. 89, Wisconsin Statutes of 1898. On June 3, 1925, respondent paid to appellant the required policy fee and an advance premium, whereupon he became a member of the company, and it issued to him its certificate or policy of insurance against loss by wind-storm, covering his dwelling house and contents for the term of five years. Sec. 7 of the by-laws, which were a part of the contract, authorized the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Breakstone v. Appleton Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tomashek v. Hartland Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bitters v. Central Mutual Hail & Cyclone InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Johnson v. Hartland Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API