Forrester ex rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kaul, J.:
The appellant (plaintiff) has filed a motion for rehearing directed at our ruling disallowing interest appearing in the last paragraph of our opinion in the above entitled case (Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 213 Kan. 442, 516 P. 2d 173 [decided December 8, 1973]). Appellee has not responded to appellant’s motion.
After consideration, we find the motion should be allowed. Therefore, the paragraph of our opinion referred to is deleted. In its stead we hold that judgment should be entered for appellant in the amount of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Elton v. Bankers Life & Casualty CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fernandez v. Selected Risks Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Glickman, Inc. v. Home Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996