Legal Opinion

Forrester ex rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1974No. 47,036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

The appellant (plaintiff) has filed a motion for rehearing directed at our ruling disallowing interest appearing in the last paragraph of our opinion in the above entitled case (Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 213 Kan. 442, 516 P. 2d 173 [decided December 8, 1973]). Appellee has not responded to appellant’s motion.

After consideration, we find the motion should be allowed. Therefore, the paragraph of our opinion referred to is deleted. In its stead we hold that judgment should be entered for appellant in the amount of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Elton v. Bankers Life & Casualty CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. Selected Risks Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Glickman, Inc. v. Home Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API