Legal Opinion

Constantin v. Martin

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1954No. 4871PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

On February 23, 1949, M. G. Martin and Kenneth A. Ellison, being then the owners of oil and gas leases covering the SW % and the W % of the SE % of S. 18, T. 10 N., R. 20 W., entered into a contract with Constantin, by the terms of which Martin and Ellison agreed to assign to Constantin such oil and gas leases, in consideration of Constantin drilling a well on the tract of land covered by such leases. The contract provided that there should be reserved to the assignors “an undivided %iths of the leasehold estate (being equivalent to %oths of the %ths gross production),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. May v. MaurerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brumark Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Fancher v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1954
  3. Application of MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Constantin v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  5. Peter Fox Brewing Co. v. Sohio Petroleum Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API