People v. Smith
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
We held in People v Huertas (75 NY2d 487 [1990]) that a crime victim could testify to her own description of her attacker, given to the police shortly after the crime. We now hold that a police officer’s testimony to a victim’s description, where it does not tend to mislead the jury, may also be admissible under the Huertas rule.
I
Defendant was convicted of robbing Hector Velez. A video recording that shows Velez being robbed by two men was admitted *465into evidence, but the face of the man alleged to be defendant does not appear clearly on the video. Velez identified…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. BuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. CasertaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. HuertasNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- The People v. Daniel A. LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- The People v. Gordon GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- The People v. Clifford GrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- The People v. Thomas JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- People v. HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.