Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2013PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

We held in People v Huertas (75 NY2d 487 [1990]) that a crime victim could testify to her own description of her attacker, given to the police shortly after the crime. We now hold that a police officer’s testimony to a victim’s description, where it does not tend to mislead the jury, may also be admissible under the Huertas rule.

I

Defendant was convicted of robbing Hector Velez. A video recording that shows Velez being robbed by two men was admitted *465into evidence, but the face of the man alleged to be defendant does not appear clearly on the video. Velez identified…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. People v. BuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. CasertaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. People v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. HuertasNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. The People v. Daniel A. LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. The People v. Gordon GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. The People v. Clifford GrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. The People v. Thomas JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. People v. HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API