Woll v. Attorney General
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
A statute makes it a misdemeanor to solicit a person injured as a result of an accident for the purpose of making a claim for damages or prosecuting an action based on the injury.1 Woll, *511-Posner and Keane, who are lawyers, were indicted under the statute. They contend that the statute is void for vagueness and because it deprives them of equal protection of the law. Woll further contends that the statute is inapplicable to workers’ compensation cases.
We hold:
1) The Legislature intended that the statute apply to workers’ compensation cases, at least where the claim arises out of an accident.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- People v. PetrellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. MayhewMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. CavaianiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.