Legal Opinion
Pinckney v. Ozmint
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 31, 2007No. C.A. 9:06-2274-PMD-GCKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DUFFY, District Judge.
Petitioner John Pinckney (“Petitioner” or “Pinckney”), a pro se state prisoner, seeks habeas corpus relief under Title 28, United States Codes Section 2254. This matter has been reviewed by the United States Magistrate Judge and is currently before the court upon the recommendation that summary judgment be entered in favor of Respondents. The record includes the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“R & R”), which was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). A petitioner may object, in writing, to an R & R within ten days after being served…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lyles v. McReeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- Stoots v. SpartiDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023