Legal Opinion

Haas v. Wisconsin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 5, 2004No. 03-1450PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*108ORDER

On February 22, 2002, Gerard N. Haas, Jr. filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Wisconsin governmental entities and individuals associated with those entities. The district court held that it was without subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, that the defendants were entitled to immunity and that Mr. Haas could not state a claim on the merits. Mr. Haas timely appealed. For the reasons set forth in the following order, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

BACKGROUND

On May 12, 1998, Mr. Haas was stopped by Racine police officers.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Pulliam v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re RazziUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. BELL v. HENKEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
  3. Brett Evers, individually and as parent and guardian of minor child GE v. Town of Grand Chute, et al.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
  4. Clayton J. Fucich v. Barry W. AsheDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2026
  5. Derrick v. BealeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API