Legal Opinion

Cocktail Fortune, Inc. v. Supervisor of Liquor Control

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 29, 1999No. 81309PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, Jr., Judge.

Appellant, Missouri’s Supervisor of Liquor Control (“Supervisor”), appeals a judgment of the circuit court reversing a decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (“AHC”) that the liquor license of Cocktail Fortune, Inc. (“Cocktail”) was “subject to discipline” because Cocktail had permitted “lewd conduct” on its premises. The circuit court concluded that the term “oral copulation” as used in 11 CSR 70-2.130, the liquor license regulation banning lewd conduct, was unconstitutionally vague, thus making that part of the regulation unenforceable. After a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Tax Commission v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. State v. ShumateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. State v. MahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. State v. SchleiermacherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. CellaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Feldhaus v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  3. State v. SelfSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. PetersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. Atmos Energy Corp. v. Public Service Commission of the StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API