People v. Adam O.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment of conviction, rendered April 5, 2012, affirmed.

Defendant’s present challenge to the facial sufficiency of the accusatory instrument is lacking in merit. The information— comprising the misdemeanor complaint and the arresting police officer’s supporting deposition—alleged that at a specified time defendant entered into a designated subway station “beyond the turnstiles,” without permission or authority to do so and without paying the required fare, “by doubling up through a turnstile with another person.” Giving the sworn police allegations “a fair and not overly…