Legal Opinion

People v. Lang

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided January 2, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.

Charged by information with theft of services and criminal trespass in the third degree, defendant moves to dismiss the accusatory instrument for facial insufficiency, contending that the sworn allegations fail to establish that she entered a subway *870station beyond the turnstiles without paying the required fare — an essential element of both charges.

In order to be sufficient on its face, an information must provide reasonable cause to believe that the defendant has committed the crime charged and contain nonhearsay allegations that, if true,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Adam O.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2014
  2. People v. LaureanoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API