Legal Opinion
Foster v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 23, 1980No. Civ. 48223PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
Petitioner Foster confronts trial on a charge of indecent exposure (Pen. Code, § 314, subd. 1). The essence of the charge is that while in the employ of Santa Clara County and performing maintenance work in the vicinity of that court’s juvenile hall, he exposed himself to minors who were housed in the hall at the time. Two minors, Tanya and Arlene, are the alleged victims and sole complaining witnesses against defendant. At the preliminary hearing defense counsel sought to cross-examine Tanya regarding the length of and the reason for her detention in the hall, but the trial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. ReberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. HusteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Arcelona v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- J.E. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.