Legal Opinion

McMurdie v. Chugg

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1940No. 6278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

Appellant, plaintiff below, recovered judgment against defendants for $634.48, the face value and interest on certain notes representing the balance due on the purchase price for certain land and water stock, and also for $100 for attorney’s fees necessitated by the bringing of action. The lower court held, however, that plaintiff did not have a vendor’s lien on said property and was not entitled to sale on execution because the property constituted the homestead of defendants (respondents) and was protected from foreclosure by Article XXII, Sec. 1 of the Utah Constitution.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hays v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Volker-Scowcroft Lumber Co. v. VanceUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Finnell v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Farnsworth v. PepperIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Guarantee Trust & Banking Co. v. American National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. CassityUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re WilliamsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
  3. Peterson v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sanders v. CassityUtah Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API