State v. Damron, 06ca-150 (10-26-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant Stephen Damron appeals the denial of a Motion to Suppress from his criminal case in the Licking County Court of Common Pleas. Appellee is the State of Ohio.
{¶ 2} On March 17, 2006 at approximately 7:52 pm, Patrolman Clint Eskins of the Newark Police Department was working drug interdiction. The interdiction team were watching a house on Hancock Street. Suppression Motion Transcript at 21. Another patrolman radioed Patrolman Eskins and informed him appellant left the house in brown van. T. at 21. Patrolman Eskins followed appellant in his vehicle eastbound on Hancock…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Township of Bainbridge v. Kaseda, 2007-G-2797 (5-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Stae v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals · 2018