Legal Opinion

Winchell v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 8, 1960No. 904-58PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, as administrator-with-will-annexed of the Estate of Jane H. Winchell, seeks refund of estate taxes paid in the sum of $89,321.37, together with interest, alleged to have been erroneously assessed and collected. Jurisdiction of the court is based on Title 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (1).

On November 19,1928, while a resident of New York, decedent created the trust which is the subject of this litigation. The subject matter of the trust included extensive security holdings. She later moved to California, where she died October 16, 1950.

The value of this trust had not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Helvering v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Loughridge's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Loughridge's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. Archbold Van Beuren v. Martin M. McLoughlin (Former Acting Collector of Internal Revenue), DefendnatsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Robert W. Winchell, Administrator With Will Annexed of the Estate of Jane H. Winchell, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API