Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Ottewell
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1989No. Docket 96853PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. Warshawsky, J.
By leave granted, defen*753dants Richard S. Ottewell, Julian M. Levant and James R. Nair appeal from a November 10, 1986, Oakland Circuit Court order affirming sanctions imposed by the 52nd District Court, 4th Division.
Defendants Ottewell and Levant are Oakland County attorneys. Defendant Nair is an accountant employed by defendant Ottewell. Both Nair and Ottewell are officers and directors of defendant Northside Cars, Inc.
The underlying action was commenced by plaintiffs Dale Hicks, Clinton Meyering, and Martin Walker, Jr., in district court in July, 1981, to recover $3,000 in past due rent from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Association Research and Development Corporation v. CNA Financial Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Briarwood v. Faber’s Fabrics, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Randall v. Meridian Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McAuley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Casey v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re Disaster at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on August 16, 1987District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
- Vittiglio v. VittiglioMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Michigan Bell Telephone Company v. SfatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.