Legal Opinion
Casey v. Auto-Owners Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 14, 2007No. Docket 266576PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Per curiam
i. OVERVIEW
Plaintiffs, Everett and Maryalice Casey, appeal as of right the trial court orders denying the Caseys’ motions for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(0(10) and granting defendants, Auto-Owners Insurance Company and its subsidiary Home-Owners Insurance Company (collectively referred to as Auto-Owners), ASU Group, and Meredith Reschly, summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10). This case arose when a fire damaged the Caseys’ home and they filed a claim for insurance benefits. We affirm.
II. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 10, 2001, a fire damaged the Caseys’…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Roberts v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Zaremba Equipment, Inc. v. Harco National InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Cox v. Eric J. Hartman, M.D., & Blue Water Obstetrics & Gynecology Prof'l Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Zaremba Equipment, Inc. v. Harco National InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Sisk-Rathburn v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Stein v. Home-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.