Michigan Bell Telephone Company v. Sfat
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals as of right from the May 15, 1987, order of the Wayne Circuit Court entering judgment in accordance with an earlier consent agreement of the parties and imposing sanctions against both defendant and his attorney. We affirm.
Plaintiff Michigan Bell Telephone Company commenced this action in March of 1984 to recover sales commissions and cash advances which were allegedly fraudulently obtained by defendant, a former employee of Michigan Bell. On two occasions before commencing this suit, Michigan Bell had discharged defendant because of "unauthorized advertising” activity. Each…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Storey v. Meijer, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Mich. Nat'l Bank of Detroit v. PatmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Meyer v. RosenbaumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hicks v. OttewellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Detroit v. SimonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Matter of Estate of HedstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Universal Settlements International, Inc. v. National Viatical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Brunet v. Decorative Engineering, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. MierzejewskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.