Legal Opinion

Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1994No. D-0679PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justices HIGHTOWER, HECHT and CORNYN join. Justice GAMMAGE not sitting.

This is an administrative appeal from a final order of the Texas Public Utility Commission (Commission) which granted West Texas Utilities’ (WTU) request for deferred accounting treatment for certain costs related to a new generating plant, Oklaunion Power Station Unit No. 1 (Oklaunion).1 The question presented by this case is whether the Commission has the authority under the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA)2 to allow a public utility to defer certain costs incurred during the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. State v. Public Utility Com'n of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Suburban Utility Corp. v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Railroad Com'n of Texas v. Lone Star Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Public Utility Commission v. GTE-Southwest, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. West Texas Utilities Co. v. Office of Public Utility CounselCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. State of Texas' Agencies & Institutions of Higher Learning v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. Pub. Util. Com'n v. Gte-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API