Legal Opinion
United States v. Missouri
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided January 23, 2017No. Case No. 4:11 CV 77 RWSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
‘“Why don’t you go up to the Range?’ somebody said to me. ‘The air is pure, and they have the best water on earth.’ ”
- W.P. Kinsella
Shoeless Joe
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .. .913
FINDINGS OF FACT .. .916
I. BACKGROUND CONCERNING THE DEFENDANT, THE RUSH ISLAND PLANT, AND THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS .. .916
A. The Defendant ... 916
B. The Rush Island Coal-Fired Power Plant ...917
C. Facts Concerning General Applicability of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program ... 917
D. Notice of the Violations Alleged in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alabama Power Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Club, Intervenors.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- New York v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Keith Bernard Crenshaw, United States of America v. Kamil Hakeem Johnson, United States of America v. Timothy Kevin McGruderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Ameren MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Ameren MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
- United States v. EES Coke Battery, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023