Legal Opinion
Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 2, 2007No. 05-848PublishedCited by 188 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter
In the 1970s, Congress added two air pollution control schemes to the Clean Air Act: New Source Performance *566Standards (NSPS) and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), each of them covering modified, as well as new, stationary sources of air pollution. The NSPS provisions define the term “modification,” 42 U. S. C. § 7411(a)(4), while the PSD provisions use that word “as defined in” NSPS, § 7479(2)(C). The Court of Appeals concluded that the statute requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to conform its PSD regulations on “modification” to their NSPS counterparts, and that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rowan Cos. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPASupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Northeast Hospital Corp. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.