Legal Opinion

Moore v. Cobb-Nettleton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 2005PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

LALLY-GREEN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Richard H. Moore, appeals from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Carol Cobb-Nettleton (Appellee) and Carol Cobb-Nettleton, D.S.W. and Associates. We affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court stated the factual and procedural history as follows:

This is a defamation action.

Plaintiff, Richard H. Moore, is the natural father of M.M., a mentally retarded woman who was born on April 17,1967.

Defendant, Carol Cobb-Nettleton, is a clinical social worker holding a doctorate in social work from the University of Pennsylvania. She is an adjunct associate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Banas v. Matthews International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Elia v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Rutt v. Bethlehems' Globe Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Mzamane v. WinfreyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Foster v. UPMC South Side HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Joseph v. Scranton Times, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Kia v. Imaging Sciences International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Thompson v. WagnerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API