Legal Opinion

Rutt v. Bethlehems' Globe Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1984No. 671; 1256PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

Presently before this Court are the consolidated appeals from the disposition of cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties to a libel action. The trial court granted the motion for partial summary judgment filed by Ronald R. Rutt, Sr., hereinafter appellant, after concluding as a matter of law that (1) the article at issue was capable of defamatory meaning, and (2) that appellant was a private figure plaintiff for purposes of the libel action. The motion of appellees, the Bethlehems’ Globe Times, John Strohmeyer and James B. Gaffney, for partial summary judgment…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Banas v. Matthews International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Blue Cross of Greater PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. American Future Systems, Inc. v. Better Business BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API