Legal Opinion
Martin v. City of Danville
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 23, 1927PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Prentis, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The facts of this'case are sufficiently stated in the dissenting opinion.
Our conclusion is that all of the questions here raised have been, in effect, and for sufficient reasons, decided adversely to the contentions here made by the plaintiff in error by the decisions of this court and those of the Supreme Court of the United States. Among these are, the refusal of this court, on the 31st day of March, 1925, to award this petitioner a writ of mandamus against the city of Danville, requiring the issuance of a permit to use the identical lot for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- West Bros. Brick Co. v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Mumpower v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Connor v. City of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Standard Oil Co. v. CombsOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Assaid v. City of RoanokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.