Mindell v. Goldman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.
This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover a balance alleged to be due upon a promissory note signed by the defendants Lowe and Gertrude Goldman, who are husband and wife. The defendants’ answer contains a general denial, an allegation that the note has been materially altered since it was made, and a denial of the genuineness of the signature of the witness to the note.
The note was secured by a second mortgage on land owned by the defendant Lowe Goldman. So far as here material the note, which was dated March 18, 1931,' reads as follows: “I, Lowe Goldman, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Camden Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Homer v. WallisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Graham v. MiddlebyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Simpson v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Clarke v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. IngelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Perry v. Manufacturers National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Gildenhorn v. Columbia Real Estate Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- L. Grossman Sons, Inc. v. RudderhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.