Legal Opinion

Mindell v. Goldman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 12, 1941PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover a balance alleged to be due upon a promissory note signed by the defendants Lowe and Gertrude Goldman, who are husband and wife. The defendants’ answer contains a general denial, an allegation that the note has been materially altered since it was made, and a denial of the genuineness of the signature of the witness to the note.

The note was secured by a second mortgage on land owned by the defendant Lowe Goldman. So far as here material the note, which was dated March 18, 1931,' reads as follows: “I, Lowe Goldman, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. Camden Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Homer v. WallisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  3. Graham v. MiddlebyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Simpson v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Clarke v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. IngelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. Perry v. Manufacturers National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Gildenhorn v. Columbia Real Estate Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. L. Grossman Sons, Inc. v. RudderhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API