Kopke v. Ranney
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Rule requiring exhaustion of internal remedies. The. complaint states, or sufficiently implies, that plaintiff, acting within his rights as a member of the union, questioned the administration of the affairs of the union; that several members and officers, for the purpose of silencing plaintiff, agreed among themselves to, and did, bring about plaintiff’s suspension on unfounded charges, and then, by refusing, without justification, to accept his dues, caused his expulsion. The gist of the charge is that the action was brought about by those who acted in bad faith from improper motives.
Plai…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Bauer v. Samson LodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Wax v. International Mailers UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Eidelson v. ArcherAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Browne v. Milwaukee Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Cheese v. Afram Brothers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Khaled A. Qasem v. C.E. KozarekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.