Legal Opinion

Pacific States Securities Co. v. Steiner

California Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1923No. S. F. No. 10880PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.

The plaintiff brought suit to recover the balance due upon a conditional contract of sale of an automobile, wherein Al. G. Faulkner Company was the seller and the defendant, David H. Steiner, was the purchaser. The seller assigned the contract to the plaintiff who obtained judgment in the trial court for the balance due upon the automobile. Defendant appealed from the judgment upon the judgment-roll alone.

The only defense offered in the trial court was one growing out of an oral agreement made at the time of the sale by which the seller and purchaser agreed that in the event the Harmon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Dollar v. International Banking Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Buffalo Arms, Inc. v. Remler Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. El Zarape Tortilla Factory, Inc. v. Plant Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. O'Melia v. AdkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Alameda County Title Insurance v. PanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Keeler v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API