Legal Opinion

State v. Mora

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 28, 2002No. Nos. 19417-5-III; 19418-3-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

— Jesse Mora and his wife, Machalle Mora, were each convicted of 20 counts of theft for depleting Jesse’s widowed mother’s funds from several bank ac*853counts. The Moras contend that the State failed to establish the essential elements of theft. They contend that they were legally entitled to withdraw the funds because their names were on the accounts. In the alternative, they contend that each count of theft by deception must be supported by a separate deceptive act. We hold that the original deception of inducing the mother to make them joint owners of her accounts gave rise to multiple…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  3. State v. PikeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. AgerWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. AgerWashington Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MoraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Ellis v. Mirghanbari (In re Pittman)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
  4. State Of Washington v. Helen M. DahllCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API