Legal Opinion
State v. Mora
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 28, 2002No. 19417-5-III, 19418-3-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
43 P.3d 38 (2002)
110 Wash.App. 850
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Machalle L. MORA and Jesse J. Mora, Appellants.
Nos. 19417-5-III, 19418-3-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Eight.
March 28, 2002.
Kevin L. Holt, Kennewick, for Appellants.
Andrew K. Miller, Scott W. Johnson, Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Kennewick, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
Jesse Mora and his wife, Machalle Mora, were each convicted of 20 counts of theft for depleting Jesse's widowed mother's funds from several bank accounts. The Moras contend that the State failed to establish the essential elements of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- State v. PikeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. AgerWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. AgerWashington Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Ellis v. Mirghanbari (In re Pittman)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Helen M. DahllCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021