Legal Opinion
Renda Marine, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 19, 2005No. 02-306 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court1 is plaintiffs Motion for Trial Amendment (Pl.’s Mot.), filed eleetroni-*154cally on April 6, 2005, which the court construes as a motion for an amendment of the pleadings pursuant to Rule of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) 15(b). In its motion, plaintiff claims that “the issue of what amount is owed by the Corps to Renda as its unpaid earned contract balance has been tried by implied consent of the parties,” PL’s Mot. at 3, and asks “that the [c]ourt permit [pjlaintiff to amend its Complaint to conform to the evidence presented at the trial of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Oscar RendaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.