Legal Opinion
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 29, 2006No. 00-129 CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This government contract case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
I. Facts and Procedural History
In 1992, Lockheed Martin Corporation (plaintiff or Lockheed) formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Lockheed Information Technology Company (LITC), to provide centralized mainframe and supercomputer services to its various business segments. Toward this end, LITC acquired two Cray supercomputers and various IBM mainframes for use by other Lockheed subsidiaries. The predominant users of the CRAY computers were expected to be Lockheed Missiles and…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clearmeadow Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Progressive Express Insurance v. CamilloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Abbott Laboratories v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Information Systems & Networks, Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.