Legal Opinion

Hawaii v. Nihipali

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1981No. 7489PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, J.

This is an appeal by defendant-appellant Steven Yuen from a conviction of theft in the first degree by extortion, HRS §§ 708-830(3) and 708-831(l)(b). In this appeal, appellant challenges his conviction on the grounds that he was initially denied his right to a speedy trial guaranteed by the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution and provided for under Rule 48(b) of the Hawaii Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP). Additionally, appellant claims that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. For the reasons stated below, we reject the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. United States v. Jack A. LustmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HoeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. JacksonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. WhiteHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. WassonHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API