Harry Like v. Proctor N. Carter
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.
This is a timely appeal by plaintiffs from final judgment dismissing their complaint. The facts, the pertinent state and federal statutes and regulations, the issues and the basis of decision are set out in Chief Judge Meredith’s opinion reported at D.C., 318 F. Supp. 910.
The action is brought by Harry Like and Doris Mae Armsby, public assistance applicants, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated public assistance applicants. Defendants, who are sued individually and in their official capacities, are Austin Hill, Director of the Department of Public…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Doris Holbrook v. Henry C. Pitt, and Third-Party v. Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Third- PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Paxton v. Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.