Sanborn v. Sanborn
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Saginaw. (Wilber, J.) Bill to set, aside a deed on the ground of fraud and ■duress, or, if not set aside, to hare it decreed to be a mortgage, and for an accounting. Cofnplainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Complainant and Lewis D. Sanborn, the son of the defendant, were married February 25, 1885. He was engaged in business in Saginaw, where his mother resided. After their marriage, they lived for some months with the defendant. It is evident that the relations between the complainant and the defendant were not cordial. From the view we take of the case, it is unnecessary to locate the’ blame. He purchased a home at a cost of about $10,000, in which they lived until the transaction hereinafter stated. They had one child, a girl, born in 1888. Mr. Sanborn committed heavy forgeries, for which he…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McKee v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sponseller v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Winn v. Adjustable Table Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Gardner v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Schmidt v. BarclayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Weidner v. Northway Motor & Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.