California Products, Inc. v. Mitchell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an action under a complaint in two counts, one based upon a forcible entry, the other upon a forcible detainer. Judgment went for the plaintiff and the defendants appeal.
The evidence shows, without dispute, that at a time when the agents of respondent were away from the premises in question, the appellants removed a certain lock from the door by means of which access was had to the place and to which lock respondent had the key. Appellants then' effected an entrance to the premises and substituted a heavy padlock in place of the lock. Thereupon certain personal property of respondent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kerr v. O'KeefeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Winchester v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- White v. PfiefferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Igauye v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Martin v. CassidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Eichhorn v. De La CanteraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Rutledge v. BargerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.