Legal Opinion

O'MALLEY v. Frazier

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 12, 2002No. 86,620PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Larson, J.:

This appeal raises the question of whether a conditional payment can be made on a promissory note barred by the statue of limitations and revive the obligation to pay the principal amount but not the interest thereon.

When the makers delivered a partial payment on the principal of a time-barred promissory note, they indicated an intent to repay the balance of the principal only. The payee sued to collect the *85remaining principal and interest on the note. The makers defended by asserting the statute of limitations. On cross-motions for summary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. In Re the Marriage of KillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. Bowen v. WesterhausSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Kilner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'MALLEY v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API