Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Kennedy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1963No. 306PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The only assignment of error is to the judgment entered below.

The appellants contend that in view of the following provision in the last will and testament of J. C. Lewis, to wit, “If it becomes necessary in the judgment of my Trustees to sell any of the real estate, it is my wish and desire that the farm lands known as the 'Harris Place’ be first sold to provide the necessary funds to carry out the purposes of this trust,” the trustees are not empowered to subdivide and sell any portion of the “Homeplace,” or the “Lettie Taylor Place,” until after the “Harris Place” has been sold.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brinn v. . BrinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Carter v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Laws v. . ChristmasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Moore v. LangstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Springs v. SpringsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quickel v. QuickelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. In re the Will of McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Dwyer v. AllynIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API