Legal Opinion

Moore v. Langston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1959No. 456PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

In passing on this appeal, it becomes necessary to determine whether the first codicil was intended merely as the expression of a wish or advice to the .two daughters, or whether it constituted a valid and enforceable bequest to the plaintiff.

At the date of the first codicil the testatrix was receiving from the two rental properties approximately $2,000 per month. She conveyed these properties to the corporation which she helped to organize. In payment she received stock in the corporation and its note for $50,000. The note, subject to a credit of $8,000, and a substantial block of stock in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Grandfather Home for Children, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Kale v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Miller v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Edmundson v. MortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Grant v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API