Legal Opinion
Liberty National Bank v. Kendall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 5, 1925No. 15321PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
The Liberty National Bank of Pawhuska, Okla., commenced this action in the district court of Garfield county against the defendants to recover on a promissory note for $2,000.
The record discloses that on the 6th day of April. 1921, the defendants W. L. Kendall and F. W. Weller executed and delivered to. R. L. Hall, also one of the defendants, the note sued on herein: that it was afterwards indorsed to the defendant J. A. Murphy, and later and before maturity indorsed by him to the plaintiff herein.
After maturity, the makers and indorsers defaulted in payment, and this action was commenced…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- McPherrin v. TittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Continental Ins. Co. v. ChanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Hamilton v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Southwest Nat. Bank of Commerce, of Kansas City v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- James Talcott, Inc. v. FinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Hobart M. Cable Co. v. BruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- National Bank of the Republic v. BecksteadUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Eysenbach v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of WinnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.