Legal Opinion

Hobart M. Cable Co. v. Bruce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 31, 1928No. 18531PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, O.

This action was begun in the district court of Lincoln county by th'e Hobart M. Cable Company, a corporation, as plaintiff, against "W. W. Bruce, Jr., and J. A. Scott, partners doing business under the firm name of Bruce & Scott, as defendants, to recover on 29 separate promissory notes. Defendants were engaged in the the-atre business at Chandler, Okla. They purchased of the Padelford Music Company of Oklahoma City, Okla., a "Wurlitzer piano-organ, style link, No. 2969, which was to have 52 flutes. In part payment of the purchase price, defendants, on July 28, 1925, executed a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. McPherrin v. TittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Patterson v. WrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Conqueror Trust Co. v. Bayless Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Wolfley v. WootenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beasley Hardware Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Stevens v. DeweySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Stevens v. WeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Cramer v. WeithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API